
A consortium of researchers, policymakers and practitioners has set up the project EPIC: Explaining, Preventing, and Intervening in organized Crime involvement, with support from the Dutch Research Agenda (NWA). The aim of this research is to effectively reduce the involvement of young people in serious and organized crime.
The first phase of the project is completed. With support from NWA, the second phase of EPIC kicked off in March 2024 with five different empirical work packages (WP). This phase will run for four years and is currently in full swing.
Questions about EPIC? Please send an e-mail to epic@nscr.nl
Would you like to stay up to date on our research projects and events? Sign up for the EPIC newsletter (in Dutch). The overview below lists all newsletters sent to date, ordered chronologically from oldest to newest:
In the first, completed, phase of EPIC, existing scientific knowledge about the risk and protective factors for entering serious and organized crime was examined (work package 1). Further, nationally and internationally, the available interventions were mapped out, along with what is known about their effectiveness in reducing young people’s involvement in organized crime . To do so, both scientific knowledge (work package 2) and tacit knowledge (work package 3) were consulted.

Reference: Adamse, I., Eichelsheim, V., Blokland, A., & Schoonmade, L. (2024). The risk and protective factors for entering organized crime groups and their association with different entering mechanisms: A systematic review using ASReview. European Journal of Criminology.
Reference: Boertien, E., Nguyen, Q., Van Deuren, S., Eichelsheim, V., & Blokland, A. (2024). Interventions Aimed at Preventing and Reducing the Involvement of Young People in Organized Crime: A Systematic Literature Review. Youth in Development.
In the first EPIC phase, the tacit knowledge about what works in interventions to prevent and reduce young people’s involvement in serious and organized crime was examined. This is knowledge that is present in practice, but cannot yet be found in scientific literature. In order to provide the most complete picture possible, the plans of ‘Prevention with authority’ of eight municipalities were analysed, interviews were held with municipalities and police officers, and focus groups were held with young people and youth workers.

^ to menu

The second phase first of all involves quantitative research (work package 4) on the prevalence of young people’s exposure to serious and organized crime in the Netherlands (how many?). This workpackage also examines the various risk and protective factors that influence the involvement in, persistence in, and desistance from organized crime (who, where and under what circumstances?). In particular, the role of criminal and social networks is examined.
In addition, the underlying mechanisms behind this involvement are explored through qualitative research methods (work package 5), including interviews with young people who are or have been involved in serious and organized crime, as well as analyses of criminal investigation files (why?).
Finally, three research projects focus on evaluating and further developing (preventive) interventions through action research (workpackage 6) and on examining the effectiveness of interventions (workpackage 7 and 8).
The research is done in close collaboration with municipalities, practitioners, young people and parents.
An overview of the work packages: Who is examining what?
Who is examining what? (juni 2025)
^ to menu

Research question: To what extent is exposure to organized crime within an individual’s network related to involvement in organized crime among young people?
Research method: unique network data from Statistics Netherlands, we compare the proportion of criminally involved individuals within young people’s networks and examine how this influences their involvement in organized crime.
Preliminary results: Based on CBS register data covering nearly 3 million young people in the Netherlands (12-26 years), exposure to organized crime through family, housemates, classmates and colleagues appear to increase the likelihood that young people become involved themselves. Family members and housemates exert the strongest influence, , followed by classmates and colleagues, while neighbours seem to have little influence on young people’s involvement in organized crime.

This research is being conducted by Julie Erber (PhD), Arjan Blokland, Marjolijn Das, Steve van de Weijer and Brenda Bos. Questions about this research? Mail Julie Erber
^ to menu

Research questions: How do young people become involved in serious and organized crime? To what extent and in which ways do social media platforms play a role in this?
Research method: We conduct interviews with both professionals – such as youth workers and police officers – and young people who are/were or ‘at risk’ for becoming involved in organized crime in two Dutch cities (Amsterdam and Arnhem).
Preliminary results: Professionals and young people report that the online environment has expanded young people’s social networks, which may also increase the likelihood of coming into contact with serious and organized crime. At the same time, respondents emphasize that existing, offline contacts often still play an important role in the process of becoming involved in criminal behaviour. For young people, there is no strict distinction between the online and offline world; the two are fully intertwined.

This research is being conducted by Nathalie Denie (PhD), Edward Kleemans, Robby Roks and Sjoukje van Deuren. Questions about this research? Mail Nathalie Denie
^ to menu

Research questions: What is the goal of the intervention, which resources and methods are used to achieve these goals, what is the added value, what are effective elements and what are opportunities for further development of the intervention?
Research method: In close collaboration with practitioners and young people, action research is used to investigate what works, for whom it works, and how the intervention can be gradually optimized. The researcher conducts participant observations and interviews with professionals, young people, parents and partner organizations.
Progress update: We started with construing the theory of change on paper for each invention in close collaboration with the initiatives. The theory of change will be examined both in light of existing scientific knowledge as experiences in practice. As part of the action research approach – in which science and practice work together – participant observations were carried out in the past year at the interventions. In addition, 12 interviews were conducted with professionals. More interviews with parents, young people, professionals and cooperation partners will follow soon.

Deze drie interventies worden onder leiding van Eva Mulder, Fleur Souverein, Lucres Nauta-Jansen, Lieke van Domburgh en Alexandra de Meijere (PhD kandidaat). Vragen over dit actieonderzoek? Mail Alexandra
^ to menu

Research questions: To what extent are the interventions ‘Educational Centre’ and ‘Boundary Youth Work’ effective? What are effective elements? And for whom?
Research method: We use several methods ofof research. The starting point of the effectiveness study is to answer questions such as Does it work?’ (effectiveness), ‘What and how does it work?’ (mechanisms) and ‘Who does it work for?’ (target group). The interventions are studied using a mixed‑methods design, combining quantitative methods (such as questionnaires) with qualitative methods (such as interviews, focus groups, and diary notes). For each young person, we examine what changes occur during and after their participation in the intervention. We also investigate which factors, according to young people and professionals, contribute to these changes.
Progress update: Over the past year, we have developed the research designs. In doing so, we discovered that existing instruments, such as questionnaires, do not always align well with our target group. For young people with mild intellectual disabilities in particular, instruments often prove too complex. In addition, strict, effect-measuring research designs do not always fit in well with the complex reality of practice, which is dynamic and sometimes unpredictable. Data collection at the Educational Center has now started. In the coming year, we will also begin data collection for Grenzenstellend Jongerenwerk.

This research is being conducted by Wenda Sleijpen (PhD), Annemiek Harder, Fleur Souverein, Sanne Pronk and Renske van der Gaag. Questions about this research? Mail Wenda Sleijpen
^ to menu

Research question: To what extent are the programs Kapot Sterk, Buit in de Klas and Prospect4Cash, effective in achieving their goals? What works, for whom and under what circumstances?
Research methodology: The study consists of quantitative questionnaire research using pre‑, post‑, and follow‑up measurements. Two programs (Buit in de Klas and Kapot Sterk) are being evaluated through a Randomized Controlled Trial to ensure that any observed changes can be attributed to the intervention. Prospect4Cash is being examined using a repeated SCED design.
Progress update: Last year (2025), data collection for the effect study on Kapot Sterk was completed. Questionnaires were administered to pupils in groups 7 and 8 at three time points. In total, almost 260 young people completed all three questionnaires, including 142 in the experimental group and 115 in the control group. The results will be analysed this year (2026). Data collection for Buit in de Klas will be completed in July 2026, and the study on Prospect4Cash is still ongoing.
Prospect4Cash targets young people aged 16 to 21 and aims to help them findand keep a job. The program supports young people in bringing structure to their daily lives by making (work‑related) agreements and identifying their talents. Its goals include securing suitable work or internships, developing employee skills, and preventing involvement in crime.

The research is being done by Marit van de Mheen (PhD), Jessica Asscher, Veroni Eichelsheim and Sjoukje van Deuren. Do you have a question? Mail Marit van de Mheen
^ to menu
^ to menu
The EPIC project was developed and is carried out by a consortium of researchers, policymakers and practioniores , with support from the Dutch National Science Agenda (NWA).
EPIC Steering Committee: Prof. dr. Arjan Blokland, project leader, Prof. dr. Veroni Eichelsheim, Prof. dr. Frank Weerman, dr. Sjoukje van Deuren, dr. Fleur Souverein, Prof. dr. Eva Mulder, Prof. dr. Annemiek Harder, Prof. dr. Jessica Asscher and Prof. dr. Edward Kleemans.
WP 4 – Youth exposure to and involvement in organised crime:
Julie Erber, Arjan Blokland, Marjolijn Das, Brenda Bos and Steve van de Weijer
WP 5 Offline and online paths to the involvement of young people in organised crime:
Nathalie Denie, Edward Kleemans, Robby Roks and Sjoukje van Deuren
WP 6 – Evaluating and further developing interventions aimed at the involvement of young people in organised crime:
Alexandra de Meijere, Eva Mulder, Fleur Souverein, Lucres Nauta-Jansen and Lieke van Domburgh
WP 7 – What works to prevent young people from becoming involved in organised crime?
Wenda Sleijpen, Annemiek Harder, Fleur Souverein, Sanne Pronk and Renske van der Gaag
WP 8 – What works to make young people resilient against organised crime?
Marit van de Mheen, Jessica Asscher, Veroni Eichelsheim and Sjoukje van Deuren
WP 9 – EPIC communication:
Eva Mulder, Fleur Souverein, Sjoukje van Deuren, Veroni Eichelscheim and Janna Kool

Vrije University Amsterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, University of Amsterdam, Tilburg University, Leiden University, Utrecht University, Groningen University, Leids University Medical Center (LUMC), Amsterdams University Medical Center (AmsterdamUMC), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Statistics Netherlands (CBS), Bureau Beke, HALT foundation, Young Perspectives, Centre for Crime Prevention and Safety (CCV), Academic Collaborative Centre for At-Risk Youth (AWRJ), Municipal Health Service (GGD), iHub Education & Family Care, Police Amsterdam en the municipalities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Utrecht and Arnhem.
^ to menu
For more information about EPIC research, please send an email to epic@nscr.nl. You can also visit the EPIC linkedin page (in Dutch)
^ to menu