Cybercrime includes numerous offenses and can be studied from different theoretical perspectives. In current research, for example, life-course theory and routine activity theory are used. Because little empirical research has been done into cybercrime, it is unclear whether – and to what extent – traditional theories of criminology can be used to explain cybercrimes. For example, the convergence in time and space of offenders and victims in the case of a hack is different than that of a burglary or mugging. Therefore, traditional theories form the basis to study cybercrimes, but these theories will be tested for their suitability in relation to cybercrime.
The members of this group study offenders, victims and other stakeholders, and issues surrounding the legal approach and regulation of cybercrime. Examples of recent research carried out by cluster members include a study into the origin and growth processes of cybercriminal networks, the risk factors for cybercrime offending and victimisation, life-course factors and the influence of the personal networks, the effects of reputation, information diffusion and rule enforcement on trust in criminal networks operating on the dark web (the hidden parts of the internet where criminals interact).
The Cybercrime group uses traditional data sources such as surveys, police files, the Social Statistical Database of Statistics Netherlands, but also big data from the dark web. In the future, they also want to unlock data from private parties (e.g. Internet Service Providers or cyber security companies).
NSCR is a member of the Amsterdam Cyber Security Center AMSec.
Cybercrime: Recent news